Penggunaan Balutan Modern Memperbaiki Proses Penyembuhan Luka Diabetik

Authors

  • Dina Dewi Sartika Lestari Ismail Jurusan Keperawatan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya
  • Dewi Irawaty Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan Universitas Indonesia
  • Tutik Sri Haryati Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jkb.2009.025.01.7

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic carbohydrate metabolism disturbance with many long term complications. One
of its complications is diabetic wound risk to amputation. Wound care is nursing intervention aimed to prevent
the risk of amputation. A cost effective evaluation is needed to identify the most benefecial wound care. A
quasi-experiment comparing modern and conventional with pretest and post test with control group design
was conducted with 16 selected patients. The outcome measure is wound healing process score based on
Bates-Jansen wound assessment while the cost measured is wound care material cost. An independent t test
with 95% confidence interval was performed to evaluate the difference of healing process and cost effectivity
between modern and conventional dressing. The result showed a significant differences of healing process
score (p=0,002) and cost effectivity (p=0,031) between modern and conventional dressing application for
diabetic wound. It can be concluded that the application of modern dressing significantly improve the healing
process in diabetic wound but with higher treatment cost.
Keywords : Diabetic wound, Modern Dressing, Healing Process, Cost Effectivity Care

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DAFTAR KEPUSTAKAAN

Smeltzer SC, Bare BG, Hinkle JL, & Cheever KH. Brunner and Suddarth's Texbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing. (9 th Ed) Philadelpia;Lippincott; 2000

World Health Organization. Diabetes Mellitus. Online[WWW].2006. http://www.who.int. [diakses 22 Juli 2008]

Sheehan P. Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcer over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of complete healing in a 12-week prospective trial. Online [WWW]. 2003. http://www.medscape.com [diakses 14 Nopember 2007]

Nandavati. Perawatan optimal luka khaki diabetik, apakah efisien biaya. Online [WWW]. 2002. http://:www.husada.co.id/. [diakses 20 Nopember 2007]

Anonim. Skills module : role of clinical nurse oe medical assistant in preventing foot ulcer and amputation in persons with diabetes. Online [WWW].2007. Http://www.Acponline.org/clinicalskill [diakses 22 Juli 2008]

Lee G. Wound care: what's really cost-effective Online[WWW].2001. http://www.Ensiclopedia.com. [diakses 22 Nopember 2007]

Sharp A & Mc Comick. Alginate dressings and the healing of diabetic foot ulcers - Wound Care. Online[WWW].2002. http://www.findartikel.com. [diakses 11 Nopember 2007]

Muha. Local wound care in diabetic foot complications. Online [WWW]. 1999. http://www.postgradmed.com. [diakses 18 Februari 2008]

Anonim. Dressing up: the case for advanced wound care. Online[WWW]. 2008. http://www.hospitalmanagement.net/feature/[diakses 22 Oktober 2007]

Deodhar AK & Rana RE. Surgical physiology of wound healing: a review. Online [WWW]. 1997. http://www.jpgmonline.com. [diakses 29 Januari 2008]

Torre J. Wound Healing, Chronic wounds. Online [WWW]. 2006. http://www.emedecine.com [diakses 4 Februari 2008]

Frank J Peter. Wound management: cost effectivenes in wound care. Online [WWW]. 2006. http://www.medscape.com [diakses 14 November 2007]

Hardings KG. Clinical review: chronic wound healing. Online[WWW]. http://www.woundheal.org [diakses 5 Juni 2008]

Anonim. Modern wound management dressings. Prescribing nursing bulletin.1999;1(2)

Downloads

Issue

Section

Research Article